<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
    <channel>
        <title>CoinToday</title>
        <link>https://www.cointoday.ai</link>
        <atom:link href="https://www.cointoday.ai/rss_en.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
        <description>AI-driven crypto media, CoinToday. Latest news about Altcoins, meme coins, RWA, STO, DeFi, NFTs, Market analysis, investment strategies and more.</description>
        
        <item>
            <title><![CDATA[Utah Files 13 Felonies Against Kalshi in $61 Million Gambling Case]]></title>
            <link>https://www.cointoday.ai/en/news/market/01874/utah-files-13-felonies-against-kalshi-in-dollar61-million-gambling-case</link>
            <guid>https://www.cointoday.ai/en/news/market/01874/utah-files-13-felonies-against-kalshi-in-dollar61-million-gambling-case</guid>
            <description><![CDATA[- Utah seeks $61 million from KalshiEX LLC in unprecedented felony gambling prosecution  - Outcome could set a national standard for federally registered prediction markets  On October 29, 2026, 24/7 Wall St. reported that Utah state prosecutors filed 13 felony charges against prediction market operator KalshiEX LLC and its co-founders, Tarek Mansour and Luana Lopes Lara. Prosecutors believe the case could redefine regulation of online wagering platforms, and authorities allege that KalshiEX illegally promoted online sports betting under the guise of a federally regulated prediction market while deriving substantial fees from Utah-based users.According to 24/7 Wall St. on October 29, 2026, the charges stem from undercover wagers placed by a state agent. As a result, prosecutors brought one count of pattern of unlawful activity, 11 counts of online gambling promotion, and one count of general gambling promotion, and this prosecution marks the first time felony action has targeted a federally registered prediction market.In addition, 24/7 Wall St. reported on October 29, 2026, that Utah seeks up to $61.2 million in allegedly unlawful fees through a parallel civil lawsuit. Kalshi disputes the charges and asserts that its activities comply with federal regulations, while the company characterizes the prosecution as politically motivated.Meanwhile, legal experts referenced by 24/7 Wall St. on October 29, 2026, say Utah’s felony charges, in contrast with earlier misdemeanors brought by states such as Arizona, could encourage other states to pursue similar actions against prediction markets, including industry leaders Kalshi and Polymarket. They note that the case’s resolution is entangled with ongoing regulatory disputes involving the CFTC and may have far-reaching consequences for the future of prediction markets in the U.S., and observers add that the case could ultimately reach the Supreme Court and shape legal standards around state versus federal oversight of online betting platforms.According to 24/7 Wall St. on October 29, 2026, Utah’s prosecution of Kalshi remains ongoing, and the outcome of the criminal and civil cases carries potential industry-wide implications.]]></description>
            <pubDate>2026-10-29 15:11:46</pubDate>
            <category><![CDATA[Market]]></category>
            <dc:creator><![CDATA[Paul]]></dc:creator>
            <content:encoded><![CDATA[- Utah seeks $61 million from KalshiEX LLC in unprecedented felony gambling prosecution  - Outcome could set a national standard for federally registered prediction markets  On October 29, 2026, 24/7 Wall St. reported that Utah state prosecutors filed 13 felony charges against prediction market operator KalshiEX LLC and its co-founders, Tarek Mansour and Luana Lopes Lara. Prosecutors believe the case could redefine regulation of online wagering platforms, and authorities allege that KalshiEX illegally promoted online sports betting under the guise of a federally regulated prediction market while deriving substantial fees from Utah-based users.According to 24/7 Wall St. on October 29, 2026, the charges stem from undercover wagers placed by a state agent. As a result, prosecutors brought one count of pattern of unlawful activity, 11 counts of online gambling promotion, and one count of general gambling promotion, and this prosecution marks the first time felony action has targeted a federally registered prediction market.In addition, 24/7 Wall St. reported on October 29, 2026, that Utah seeks up to $61.2 million in allegedly unlawful fees through a parallel civil lawsuit. Kalshi disputes the charges and asserts that its activities comply with federal regulations, while the company characterizes the prosecution as politically motivated.Meanwhile, legal experts referenced by 24/7 Wall St. on October 29, 2026, say Utah’s felony charges, in contrast with earlier misdemeanors brought by states such as Arizona, could encourage other states to pursue similar actions against prediction markets, including industry leaders Kalshi and Polymarket. They note that the case’s resolution is entangled with ongoing regulatory disputes involving the CFTC and may have far-reaching consequences for the future of prediction markets in the U.S., and observers add that the case could ultimately reach the Supreme Court and shape legal standards around state versus federal oversight of online betting platforms.According to 24/7 Wall St. on October 29, 2026, Utah’s prosecution of Kalshi remains ongoing, and the outcome of the criminal and civil cases carries potential industry-wide implications.]]></content:encoded>
            <media:content url="https://files.ainetwork.xyz/blkchn-today.firebasestorage.app/articles%2FvIN8xH6P3V7C4U51OfqJ%2Fcover%2F1793286717866.webp" medium="image" />
        </item>
    
        <item>
            <title><![CDATA[Apple secures AI forensic records order in OpenAI case]]></title>
            <link>https://www.cointoday.ai/en/news/market/01873/apple-secures-ai-forensic-records-order-in-openai-case</link>
            <guid>https://www.cointoday.ai/en/news/market/01873/apple-secures-ai-forensic-records-order-in-openai-case</guid>
            <description><![CDATA[- Defendants ordered to disclose digital activity tied to Apple’s confidential hardware  - OpenAI must testify on battery and power data usage after Apple’s trade secrets complaint  On October 28, 2026 (UTC), CoinDesk reported that a U.S. District Court judge granted Apple’s request for AI forensic records in its trade secrets lawsuit against OpenAI. According to CoinDesk on October 28, 2026, the judge ordered defendants Chang Liu and Tang Tan to produce detailed records of their use of AI tools—including ChatGPT, Claude, Codex, and OpenClaw—and messaging apps, and the order focuses on how they accessed or shared Apple’s confidential hardware information.The order, which took effect on January 23, 2026, also directs OpenAI and its hardware partner, io Products, to provide testimony on any use or handling of Apple-originated battery and power management data. In addition, they must detail steps they took to prevent improper use, including specifics from relevant employee interviews.CoinDesk reported that Judge Edward Davila of the Northern District of California (Case No. 5:26-cv-07078-EJD) signed the order, and it requires Liu and Tan to identify every account, device, and app they used—such as LINE, Signal, Telegram, and Kik—across both personal and company channels involving Apple information. They must also report any losses or deletions of related data, which broadens the scope of discovery into their digital activity.As a result, Apple now gains access to extensive discovery materials, including technical records and communication histories, while the court simultaneously limits deeper inquiry into OpenAI’s internal workings and will address that issue in later proceedings.Meanwhile, the court also found that OpenAI and io Products must testify on their use of Apple data covering batteries, power management, and metal finishing processes. Apple’s July 2026 complaint alleges that OpenAI misused proprietary hardware information to accelerate its consumer hardware development, and the complaint also accuses OpenAI of hiring hundreds of former Apple employees, which heightens competition for technical expertise within Silicon Valley. Therefore, Judge Davila’s directive marks a critical shift toward focused technical discovery and personnel records that are central to Apple’s allegations.According to recent filings cited by 9to5Mac on October 28, 2026, Apple asserts that more than 400 of its former employees now work at OpenAI. The court’s order therefore emphasizes sustained discovery of digital activity and technical evidence, but it postpones broader examination of OpenAI’s internal processes until subsequent phases of the case.]]></description>
            <pubDate>2026-10-28 15:12:04</pubDate>
            <category><![CDATA[Market]]></category>
            <dc:creator><![CDATA[Planck]]></dc:creator>
            <content:encoded><![CDATA[- Defendants ordered to disclose digital activity tied to Apple’s confidential hardware  - OpenAI must testify on battery and power data usage after Apple’s trade secrets complaint  On October 28, 2026 (UTC), CoinDesk reported that a U.S. District Court judge granted Apple’s request for AI forensic records in its trade secrets lawsuit against OpenAI. According to CoinDesk on October 28, 2026, the judge ordered defendants Chang Liu and Tang Tan to produce detailed records of their use of AI tools—including ChatGPT, Claude, Codex, and OpenClaw—and messaging apps, and the order focuses on how they accessed or shared Apple’s confidential hardware information.The order, which took effect on January 23, 2026, also directs OpenAI and its hardware partner, io Products, to provide testimony on any use or handling of Apple-originated battery and power management data. In addition, they must detail steps they took to prevent improper use, including specifics from relevant employee interviews.CoinDesk reported that Judge Edward Davila of the Northern District of California (Case No. 5:26-cv-07078-EJD) signed the order, and it requires Liu and Tan to identify every account, device, and app they used—such as LINE, Signal, Telegram, and Kik—across both personal and company channels involving Apple information. They must also report any losses or deletions of related data, which broadens the scope of discovery into their digital activity.As a result, Apple now gains access to extensive discovery materials, including technical records and communication histories, while the court simultaneously limits deeper inquiry into OpenAI’s internal workings and will address that issue in later proceedings.Meanwhile, the court also found that OpenAI and io Products must testify on their use of Apple data covering batteries, power management, and metal finishing processes. Apple’s July 2026 complaint alleges that OpenAI misused proprietary hardware information to accelerate its consumer hardware development, and the complaint also accuses OpenAI of hiring hundreds of former Apple employees, which heightens competition for technical expertise within Silicon Valley. Therefore, Judge Davila’s directive marks a critical shift toward focused technical discovery and personnel records that are central to Apple’s allegations.According to recent filings cited by 9to5Mac on October 28, 2026, Apple asserts that more than 400 of its former employees now work at OpenAI. The court’s order therefore emphasizes sustained discovery of digital activity and technical evidence, but it postpones broader examination of OpenAI’s internal processes until subsequent phases of the case.]]></content:encoded>
            <media:content url="https://files.ainetwork.xyz/blkchn-today.firebasestorage.app/articles%2FgnX87EJxRdOQCrXBnm0G%2Fcover%2F1793200343650.webp" medium="image" />
        </item>
    
        <item>
            <title><![CDATA[OneKey Caps Data at 30 Days After Keystone Breach Exposes 26,000 Records]]></title>
            <link>https://www.cointoday.ai/en/news/market/01872/onekey-caps-data-at-30-days-after-keystone-breach-exposes-26000-records</link>
            <guid>https://www.cointoday.ai/en/news/market/01872/onekey-caps-data-at-30-days-after-keystone-breach-exposes-26000-records</guid>
            <description><![CDATA[- OneKey pledges 30-day deletion after rival breach exposes 26,000 customer records  - Keystone’s failure to erase data triggers sector-wide scrutiny and tighter retention policies  On 2026-10-27, CoinDesk reported that OneKey will permanently erase all customer order data within 30 days. The outlet noted that the company introduced this policy following a major supply chain breach at hardware wallet rival Keystone, which allegedly failed to delete user records as promised. The incident resulted in a leak that exposed nearly 26,000 customer records and device authentication keys, and it prompted OneKey to overhaul its data handling and audit policies amid growing sector-wide vulnerabilities.On 2026-10-26, Cryptonomist reported that OneKey founder Yishi Wang directly linked the new retention limit to industry risks highlighted by Keystone’s breach. In addition, ForkLog reported that attackers accessed 25,964 buyer records and 12,873 incomplete checkout entries, including names, addresses, contact information, and order histories, after Keystone’s automated 180-day deletion policy for Shopify data silently malfunctioned. According to ForkLog, this malfunction left records from 2024 exposed and compromised, and attackers also obtained a WebAuth hardware authentication key that investigators traced to a vulnerability in a third-party monitoring tool. As a result, Keystone conducted a recall of 18,835 affected devices and reduced its retention window to 90 days.Other hardware wallet firms, such as Trezor and SafePal, have faced similar breaches, and these incidents mainly stemmed from fulfillment partners and e-commerce platforms that failed to promptly delete or anonymize buyer information. The Register reported in August 2026 that Trezor’s logistics partner ShipMonk exposed 81,000 customer records, while SafePal shortened its retention period after an incident affecting nearly 40,000 users. However, despite updated policies, challenges persist because deletion guarantees rely on third-party compliance and reliable automated systems.OneKey’s move to limit data retention to 30 days and launch comprehensive supply chain audits reflects intensified industry efforts to address these risks. Companies now seek to enforce stronger partner oversight, shorten exposure windows, and protect personally identifiable information, while the Keystone breach underscores that supply chain vulnerabilities—not just vendor policies—continue to drive urgent calls for stricter data controls across the hardware wallet sector. As a result, incident reports and official statements from OneKey and Keystone indicate ongoing shifts toward stricter retention limits and enhanced oversight as hardware wallet companies respond to persistent risks from breaches and supply chain attacks.]]></description>
            <pubDate>2026-10-27 15:13:06</pubDate>
            <category><![CDATA[Market]]></category>
            <dc:creator><![CDATA[Planck]]></dc:creator>
            <content:encoded><![CDATA[- OneKey pledges 30-day deletion after rival breach exposes 26,000 customer records  - Keystone’s failure to erase data triggers sector-wide scrutiny and tighter retention policies  On 2026-10-27, CoinDesk reported that OneKey will permanently erase all customer order data within 30 days. The outlet noted that the company introduced this policy following a major supply chain breach at hardware wallet rival Keystone, which allegedly failed to delete user records as promised. The incident resulted in a leak that exposed nearly 26,000 customer records and device authentication keys, and it prompted OneKey to overhaul its data handling and audit policies amid growing sector-wide vulnerabilities.On 2026-10-26, Cryptonomist reported that OneKey founder Yishi Wang directly linked the new retention limit to industry risks highlighted by Keystone’s breach. In addition, ForkLog reported that attackers accessed 25,964 buyer records and 12,873 incomplete checkout entries, including names, addresses, contact information, and order histories, after Keystone’s automated 180-day deletion policy for Shopify data silently malfunctioned. According to ForkLog, this malfunction left records from 2024 exposed and compromised, and attackers also obtained a WebAuth hardware authentication key that investigators traced to a vulnerability in a third-party monitoring tool. As a result, Keystone conducted a recall of 18,835 affected devices and reduced its retention window to 90 days.Other hardware wallet firms, such as Trezor and SafePal, have faced similar breaches, and these incidents mainly stemmed from fulfillment partners and e-commerce platforms that failed to promptly delete or anonymize buyer information. The Register reported in August 2026 that Trezor’s logistics partner ShipMonk exposed 81,000 customer records, while SafePal shortened its retention period after an incident affecting nearly 40,000 users. However, despite updated policies, challenges persist because deletion guarantees rely on third-party compliance and reliable automated systems.OneKey’s move to limit data retention to 30 days and launch comprehensive supply chain audits reflects intensified industry efforts to address these risks. Companies now seek to enforce stronger partner oversight, shorten exposure windows, and protect personally identifiable information, while the Keystone breach underscores that supply chain vulnerabilities—not just vendor policies—continue to drive urgent calls for stricter data controls across the hardware wallet sector. As a result, incident reports and official statements from OneKey and Keystone indicate ongoing shifts toward stricter retention limits and enhanced oversight as hardware wallet companies respond to persistent risks from breaches and supply chain attacks.]]></content:encoded>
            <media:content url="https://files.ainetwork.xyz/blkchn-today.firebasestorage.app/articles%2FErl2Fg4EOiW5iImVZCte%2Fcover%2F1793114006548.webp" medium="image" />
        </item>
    
        <item>
            <title><![CDATA[SpaceX Closes $40 Billion AI Chip Deal as Neoclouds Face Credit Crunch]]></title>
            <link>https://www.cointoday.ai/en/news/market/01871/spacex-closes-dollar40-billion-ai-chip-deal-as-neoclouds-face-credit-crunch</link>
            <guid>https://www.cointoday.ai/en/news/market/01871/spacex-closes-dollar40-billion-ai-chip-deal-as-neoclouds-face-credit-crunch</guid>
            <description><![CDATA[- $40 billion debt financing lets SpaceX ramp up Nvidia GPU purchases amid tightening capital for AI infrastructure  - Off-balance-sheet structure preserves SpaceX’s investment-grade rating as smaller neocloud firms face consolidation  Elon Musk warned of an industry shakeup as SpaceX secured $40 billion in debt financing for Nvidia chip purchases, and the deal signals a shift in AI infrastructure funding. It highlights growing credit difficulties for neocloud firms, which rely on AI-centric cloud data center rental and now face tough capital markets and possible closures.2026-10-26  On October 26, 2026, CoinDesk reported that SpaceX had closed the debt facility with partners including Goldman Sachs and Apollo Global Management, and the deal uses a callable special purpose vehicle (SPV) rather than direct SpaceX debt. This structure lets SpaceX maintain its investment-grade status despite heavy spending. SpaceX generated $9.6 billion in operational cash in the third quarter but spent $19.6 billion, and Musk projects fourth-quarter outlays could reach $40 billion as GPU expansion ramps up.Musk explained that SpaceX’s diversified revenue—from Starlink and launch services—and advanced financial structuring made large-scale funding possible, while most neocloud firms cannot match this. As credit tightens, less-diversified companies risk losing access to capital, and this trend is driving consolidation or shutdowns.SpaceX’s total debt could reach $79 billion if the full facility is drawn, although the SPV structure may limit the direct impact on its financial statements. The move underscores the shift in AI infrastructure financing, which is increasingly favoring well-capitalized players and raising risk for leverage-dependent competitors.According to CoinDesk, Bloomberg, and Reuters on October 26, 2026, SpaceX’s debt deal stands out in a tightening credit market, and the pace of industry consolidation is accelerating among smaller AI infrastructure providers.]]></description>
            <pubDate>2026-10-26 15:11:37</pubDate>
            <category><![CDATA[Market]]></category>
            <dc:creator><![CDATA[Paul]]></dc:creator>
            <content:encoded><![CDATA[- $40 billion debt financing lets SpaceX ramp up Nvidia GPU purchases amid tightening capital for AI infrastructure  - Off-balance-sheet structure preserves SpaceX’s investment-grade rating as smaller neocloud firms face consolidation  Elon Musk warned of an industry shakeup as SpaceX secured $40 billion in debt financing for Nvidia chip purchases, and the deal signals a shift in AI infrastructure funding. It highlights growing credit difficulties for neocloud firms, which rely on AI-centric cloud data center rental and now face tough capital markets and possible closures.2026-10-26  On October 26, 2026, CoinDesk reported that SpaceX had closed the debt facility with partners including Goldman Sachs and Apollo Global Management, and the deal uses a callable special purpose vehicle (SPV) rather than direct SpaceX debt. This structure lets SpaceX maintain its investment-grade status despite heavy spending. SpaceX generated $9.6 billion in operational cash in the third quarter but spent $19.6 billion, and Musk projects fourth-quarter outlays could reach $40 billion as GPU expansion ramps up.Musk explained that SpaceX’s diversified revenue—from Starlink and launch services—and advanced financial structuring made large-scale funding possible, while most neocloud firms cannot match this. As credit tightens, less-diversified companies risk losing access to capital, and this trend is driving consolidation or shutdowns.SpaceX’s total debt could reach $79 billion if the full facility is drawn, although the SPV structure may limit the direct impact on its financial statements. The move underscores the shift in AI infrastructure financing, which is increasingly favoring well-capitalized players and raising risk for leverage-dependent competitors.According to CoinDesk, Bloomberg, and Reuters on October 26, 2026, SpaceX’s debt deal stands out in a tightening credit market, and the pace of industry consolidation is accelerating among smaller AI infrastructure providers.]]></content:encoded>
            <media:content url="https://files.ainetwork.xyz/blkchn-today.firebasestorage.app/articles%2FXqkMO0MwdxqfXaTl2jE1%2Fcover%2F1793027506329.webp" medium="image" />
        </item>
    
        <item>
            <title><![CDATA[Republicans Slam Musk as Starlink Limits Disrupt Ukraine War Effort]]></title>
            <link>https://www.cointoday.ai/en/news/market/01870/republicans-slam-musk-as-starlink-limits-disrupt-ukraine-war-effort</link>
            <guid>https://www.cointoday.ai/en/news/market/01870/republicans-slam-musk-as-starlink-limits-disrupt-ukraine-war-effort</guid>
            <description><![CDATA[- Starlink restrictions cut Ukrainian military communications, raising concerns among US lawmakers  - Trump’s Russian diesel deal and Musk’s Starlink control highlight security risks in private infrastructure  On October 24, 2026, Fox Business reported that Elon Musk faced Republican backlash after SpaceX limited Ukraine’s access to the Starlink satellite system for military drones and fast-moving equipment, and the change disrupted battlefield communications and command operations. The controversy escalated as Donald Trump announced a temporary US-Russia diesel deal aimed at lowering fuel prices ahead of the 2026 midterm elections, and the announcement fueled debate over national security and technological dependence.According to Fox Business on October 24, 2026, Ukraine’s battlefield operations suffered significant disruption after Starlink’s data speeds were cut for drones exceeding approximately 100 mph, and the restrictions led to canceled missions and raised concerns among security experts and Republican lawmakers. They warned about the vulnerability created when a single CEO holds unilateral control over critical technology, while Ukrainian officials confirmed that command and communication links suffered and emphasized the lack of backup alternatives if SpaceX or Musk changed service terms again.Meanwhile, this development coincided with rising tensions following Trump’s US-Russia diesel agreement. On October 22, 2026, The Wall Street Journal reported that Trump negotiated a temporary relaxation of sanctions with Vladimir Putin, and the agreement resulted in an influx of Russian diesel to the US market. The move sought to lower fuel prices before the elections but drew sharp criticism from Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy. On October 20, 2026, Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy said in a Bloomberg interview that the “fuel lifeline” allowed Russia to profit economically and pressured Kyiv to compromise in ongoing negotiations.In addition, BBC News reported on October 24, 2026, that Trump personally called Musk to request lifting Starlink restrictions for Ukraine. Following Trump’s intervention, Ukrainian officials announced that service was partially restored for drones traveling up to 250 mph; however, they said full capability remained “critical for Ukraine’s defense” and warned of continued risks if Musk altered Starlink’s terms again.Lawmakers including Rep. Dan Crenshaw (R-TX) and Sen. Thom Tillis (R-NC) therefore questioned why vital US and allied military operations depend so heavily on privately operated platforms like Starlink, and their concerns underscored broader issues of technological sovereignty and energy market stability. As a result, the crisis highlighted how concentrated control in tech and energy can affect battlefield realities, geopolitical leverage, and economic outcomes beyond national policy decisions.According to Fox Business, The Wall Street Journal, Bloomberg, and BBC News, the events surrounding Starlink access, Trump’s diesel deal, and the ensuing political debate illustrate ongoing risks in national security and underscore the international consequences of relying on private infrastructure providers.]]></description>
            <pubDate>2026-10-25 20:12:06</pubDate>
            <category><![CDATA[Market]]></category>
            <dc:creator><![CDATA[Paul]]></dc:creator>
            <content:encoded><![CDATA[- Starlink restrictions cut Ukrainian military communications, raising concerns among US lawmakers  - Trump’s Russian diesel deal and Musk’s Starlink control highlight security risks in private infrastructure  On October 24, 2026, Fox Business reported that Elon Musk faced Republican backlash after SpaceX limited Ukraine’s access to the Starlink satellite system for military drones and fast-moving equipment, and the change disrupted battlefield communications and command operations. The controversy escalated as Donald Trump announced a temporary US-Russia diesel deal aimed at lowering fuel prices ahead of the 2026 midterm elections, and the announcement fueled debate over national security and technological dependence.According to Fox Business on October 24, 2026, Ukraine’s battlefield operations suffered significant disruption after Starlink’s data speeds were cut for drones exceeding approximately 100 mph, and the restrictions led to canceled missions and raised concerns among security experts and Republican lawmakers. They warned about the vulnerability created when a single CEO holds unilateral control over critical technology, while Ukrainian officials confirmed that command and communication links suffered and emphasized the lack of backup alternatives if SpaceX or Musk changed service terms again.Meanwhile, this development coincided with rising tensions following Trump’s US-Russia diesel agreement. On October 22, 2026, The Wall Street Journal reported that Trump negotiated a temporary relaxation of sanctions with Vladimir Putin, and the agreement resulted in an influx of Russian diesel to the US market. The move sought to lower fuel prices before the elections but drew sharp criticism from Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy. On October 20, 2026, Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy said in a Bloomberg interview that the “fuel lifeline” allowed Russia to profit economically and pressured Kyiv to compromise in ongoing negotiations.In addition, BBC News reported on October 24, 2026, that Trump personally called Musk to request lifting Starlink restrictions for Ukraine. Following Trump’s intervention, Ukrainian officials announced that service was partially restored for drones traveling up to 250 mph; however, they said full capability remained “critical for Ukraine’s defense” and warned of continued risks if Musk altered Starlink’s terms again.Lawmakers including Rep. Dan Crenshaw (R-TX) and Sen. Thom Tillis (R-NC) therefore questioned why vital US and allied military operations depend so heavily on privately operated platforms like Starlink, and their concerns underscored broader issues of technological sovereignty and energy market stability. As a result, the crisis highlighted how concentrated control in tech and energy can affect battlefield realities, geopolitical leverage, and economic outcomes beyond national policy decisions.According to Fox Business, The Wall Street Journal, Bloomberg, and BBC News, the events surrounding Starlink access, Trump’s diesel deal, and the ensuing political debate illustrate ongoing risks in national security and underscore the international consequences of relying on private infrastructure providers.]]></content:encoded>
            <media:content url="https://files.ainetwork.xyz/blkchn-today.firebasestorage.app/articles%2FmsIhrl24AK1TLZHG2BeZ%2Fcover%2F1792959182102.webp" medium="image" />
        </item>
    
        <item>
            <title><![CDATA[Aptos Foundation Locks 210M Tokens as APT Slips to $0.70]]></title>
            <link>https://www.cointoday.ai/en/news/market/01868/aptos-foundation-locks-210m-tokens-as-apt-slips-to-dollar070</link>
            <guid>https://www.cointoday.ai/en/news/market/01868/aptos-foundation-locks-210m-tokens-as-apt-slips-to-dollar070</guid>
            <description><![CDATA[- Foundation’s structural reform removes 18% of Aptos supply and halves staking rewards  - APT trades near $0.70 with weak short-term sentiment and declining volume  On October 25, 2026, Cryptopolitan reported that the Aptos Foundation, with community governance approval, permanently locked and staked 210 million Aptos (APT) tokens. These tokens represent approximately 18% of the circulating supply and form part of a major supply overhaul, and the reform aims to cut liquid supply, reduce inflation, and ease sell pressure. As a result, annual staking rewards were halved from 5.19% to 2.6%, and total APT supply was capped at 2.1 billion tokens. The foundation therefore directly addressed ecosystem concerns amid bearish market momentum.According to Cryptopolitan on October 25, 2026, APT traded at $0.70 and faced negative momentum based on daily and 4-hour technical indicators. Price action remained below both the 50-day and 200-day simple moving averages, while the chart showed resistance at $0.82 and support at $0.70. Technical assessments showed a neutral relative strength index at 41.22 and a declining MACD histogram, and trading volume dropped 24% over the previous day, suggesting weak market conviction. Analysts noted that breaking below key support could trigger further downside toward $0.58.On October 25, 2026, BigGo Finance reported that the foundation’s tokenomics reforms permanently reduced Aptos’s liquid supply and annual staking rewards following a community vote. Meanwhile, KuCoin Blog stated on the same day that the ecosystem now enforces a supply cap of 2.1 billion tokens and that these changes aim to decrease inflation rates and sell pressure. In addition, both outlets highlighted that network and ecosystem maturity are expected to drive future value creation.Cryptopolitan reported on October 25, 2026, that long-term projections indicate APT price targets of $2.54 by the end of 2026 and $10 or more in 2027. The outlet added that APT’s ongoing development supports fundamental strength, especially its sub-second transaction finality and scalable throughput. However, short-term market sentiment remains cautious, and Aptos faces rising competition from other Layer-1 protocols. The platform’s DeFi ecosystem also continues to expand, with total value locked surpassing $50 million as of October, which underscores growing on-chain activity despite near-term price weakness.According to CoinMarketCap on October 25, 2026, at 07:09 UTC, Aptos (APT) traded at $0.699, while 24-hour trading volume showed a -4.172% change, indicating subdued market participation.]]></description>
            <pubDate>2026-10-25 07:11:32</pubDate>
            <category><![CDATA[Market]]></category>
            <dc:creator><![CDATA[Planck]]></dc:creator>
            <content:encoded><![CDATA[- Foundation’s structural reform removes 18% of Aptos supply and halves staking rewards  - APT trades near $0.70 with weak short-term sentiment and declining volume  On October 25, 2026, Cryptopolitan reported that the Aptos Foundation, with community governance approval, permanently locked and staked 210 million Aptos (APT) tokens. These tokens represent approximately 18% of the circulating supply and form part of a major supply overhaul, and the reform aims to cut liquid supply, reduce inflation, and ease sell pressure. As a result, annual staking rewards were halved from 5.19% to 2.6%, and total APT supply was capped at 2.1 billion tokens. The foundation therefore directly addressed ecosystem concerns amid bearish market momentum.According to Cryptopolitan on October 25, 2026, APT traded at $0.70 and faced negative momentum based on daily and 4-hour technical indicators. Price action remained below both the 50-day and 200-day simple moving averages, while the chart showed resistance at $0.82 and support at $0.70. Technical assessments showed a neutral relative strength index at 41.22 and a declining MACD histogram, and trading volume dropped 24% over the previous day, suggesting weak market conviction. Analysts noted that breaking below key support could trigger further downside toward $0.58.On October 25, 2026, BigGo Finance reported that the foundation’s tokenomics reforms permanently reduced Aptos’s liquid supply and annual staking rewards following a community vote. Meanwhile, KuCoin Blog stated on the same day that the ecosystem now enforces a supply cap of 2.1 billion tokens and that these changes aim to decrease inflation rates and sell pressure. In addition, both outlets highlighted that network and ecosystem maturity are expected to drive future value creation.Cryptopolitan reported on October 25, 2026, that long-term projections indicate APT price targets of $2.54 by the end of 2026 and $10 or more in 2027. The outlet added that APT’s ongoing development supports fundamental strength, especially its sub-second transaction finality and scalable throughput. However, short-term market sentiment remains cautious, and Aptos faces rising competition from other Layer-1 protocols. The platform’s DeFi ecosystem also continues to expand, with total value locked surpassing $50 million as of October, which underscores growing on-chain activity despite near-term price weakness.According to CoinMarketCap on October 25, 2026, at 07:09 UTC, Aptos (APT) traded at $0.699, while 24-hour trading volume showed a -4.172% change, indicating subdued market participation.]]></content:encoded>
            <media:content url="https://files.ainetwork.xyz/blkchn-today.firebasestorage.app/articles%2Fm1qO2Ae7jpInB8Unc2N1%2Fcover%2F1792912304061.webp" medium="image" />
        </item>
    
        <item>
            <title><![CDATA[Irys Token Gains 1,200% Then Plunges 74% Amid Korean Trading Frenzy]]></title>
            <link>https://www.cointoday.ai/en/news/market/01867/irys-token-gains-1200percent-then-plunges-74percent-amid-korean-trading-frenzy</link>
            <guid>https://www.cointoday.ai/en/news/market/01867/irys-token-gains-1200percent-then-plunges-74percent-amid-korean-trading-frenzy</guid>
            <description><![CDATA[- IRYS price spikes to record highs before crashing, with market cap briefly nearing $600 million  - Extraordinary Korean exchange volume and liquidations fuel volatility, with no obvious catalystOn October 24, 2026 (UTC), CoinDesk reported that Irys’s IRYS token experienced unprecedented volatility as the token surged by over 1,200% in a single day, reaching new all-time highs across Bitget and Upbit exchanges. The market cap therefore soared to nearly $600 million before sentiment rapidly reversed. Within hours, IRYS plummeted more than 74% from its peak, erasing most of the day’s gains and leaving traders grappling with sharp losses.The dramatic activity was centered on Korean platforms, and Upbit’s won pair registered approximately 954 billion won in 24-hour turnover and $24 million in liquidations, mostly affecting short sellers, according to CoinDesk on October 24, 2026. Despite the massive trading volumes, no fundamental news or clear catalyst emerged to explain the sudden price action, and market participants were left to speculate about the causes.Analysts suggested that a massive short squeeze, compounded by high leverage on derivatives platforms, drove the extreme price swings, and they pointed to structural factors in the market rather than project-specific developments. In addition, tokenomics data indicated that only 20% of IRYS’s total supply was circulating, while team and investor allocations remained locked for one year, which may have amplified the impact of speculative flows on price. By the morning after the surge, IRYS traded near $0.086 with a circulating market cap around $174 million, and the token remained up over 200% in the prior 24 hours, according to CoinGecko’s historical pricing data.]]></description>
            <pubDate>2026-10-24 13:11:36</pubDate>
            <category><![CDATA[Market]]></category>
            <dc:creator><![CDATA[Paul]]></dc:creator>
            <content:encoded><![CDATA[- IRYS price spikes to record highs before crashing, with market cap briefly nearing $600 million  - Extraordinary Korean exchange volume and liquidations fuel volatility, with no obvious catalystOn October 24, 2026 (UTC), CoinDesk reported that Irys’s IRYS token experienced unprecedented volatility as the token surged by over 1,200% in a single day, reaching new all-time highs across Bitget and Upbit exchanges. The market cap therefore soared to nearly $600 million before sentiment rapidly reversed. Within hours, IRYS plummeted more than 74% from its peak, erasing most of the day’s gains and leaving traders grappling with sharp losses.The dramatic activity was centered on Korean platforms, and Upbit’s won pair registered approximately 954 billion won in 24-hour turnover and $24 million in liquidations, mostly affecting short sellers, according to CoinDesk on October 24, 2026. Despite the massive trading volumes, no fundamental news or clear catalyst emerged to explain the sudden price action, and market participants were left to speculate about the causes.Analysts suggested that a massive short squeeze, compounded by high leverage on derivatives platforms, drove the extreme price swings, and they pointed to structural factors in the market rather than project-specific developments. In addition, tokenomics data indicated that only 20% of IRYS’s total supply was circulating, while team and investor allocations remained locked for one year, which may have amplified the impact of speculative flows on price. By the morning after the surge, IRYS traded near $0.086 with a circulating market cap around $174 million, and the token remained up over 200% in the prior 24 hours, according to CoinGecko’s historical pricing data.]]></content:encoded>
            <media:content url="https://files.ainetwork.xyz/blkchn-today.firebasestorage.app/articles%2FujduZ2HU0mexDIxQwuyy%2Fcover%2F1792847505717.webp" medium="image" />
        </item>
    
        <item>
            <title><![CDATA[Russia Clears 4 Crypto Exchanges, 5 Custodians Under New Law]]></title>
            <link>https://www.cointoday.ai/en/news/market/01866/russia-clears-4-crypto-exchanges-5-custodians-under-new-law</link>
            <guid>https://www.cointoday.ai/en/news/market/01866/russia-clears-4-crypto-exchanges-5-custodians-under-new-law</guid>
            <description><![CDATA[- Sberbank among first institutions registered as Russia’s crypto market law takes effect  - Sberbank to launch crypto products beginning December 1, 2026  2026-10-07  On October 7, 2026, Crypto.news reported that Russia formally registered its first four cryptocurrency exchanges and five digital custodians, following the introduction of a new legal framework for crypto markets that took effect on September 1, 2026. Sberbank, the country’s largest bank, is among the registered institutions, and it announced plans to introduce crypto products starting December 1, 2026. As a result, these registrations signal Russia’s move toward its first comprehensive regulatory scheme for crypto trading and custody.According to Crypto.news on October 7, 2026, this development is a significant milestone for the Russian digital asset sector, as the new law regulates trading, custody, and related services. In addition, the inclusion of Sberbank highlights growing institutional involvement in Russia’s emerging crypto market and underscores the government’s attempt to integrate major financial players into the new regime. The law establishes specific requirements for exchanges and custodians, and it provides legal clarity while enhancing government oversight.Meanwhile, Sberbank’s upcoming crypto product launch aligns with the new regulatory regime and outlines a concrete timeline for further growth in Russia’s crypto sector. Therefore, the implementation of the legal framework is ongoing, and registered entities are preparing for expanded operations as regulatory processes continue to evolve.]]></description>
            <pubDate>2026-10-07 17:11:16</pubDate>
            <category><![CDATA[Market]]></category>
            <dc:creator><![CDATA[Paul]]></dc:creator>
            <content:encoded><![CDATA[- Sberbank among first institutions registered as Russia’s crypto market law takes effect  - Sberbank to launch crypto products beginning December 1, 2026  2026-10-07  On October 7, 2026, Crypto.news reported that Russia formally registered its first four cryptocurrency exchanges and five digital custodians, following the introduction of a new legal framework for crypto markets that took effect on September 1, 2026. Sberbank, the country’s largest bank, is among the registered institutions, and it announced plans to introduce crypto products starting December 1, 2026. As a result, these registrations signal Russia’s move toward its first comprehensive regulatory scheme for crypto trading and custody.According to Crypto.news on October 7, 2026, this development is a significant milestone for the Russian digital asset sector, as the new law regulates trading, custody, and related services. In addition, the inclusion of Sberbank highlights growing institutional involvement in Russia’s emerging crypto market and underscores the government’s attempt to integrate major financial players into the new regime. The law establishes specific requirements for exchanges and custodians, and it provides legal clarity while enhancing government oversight.Meanwhile, Sberbank’s upcoming crypto product launch aligns with the new regulatory regime and outlines a concrete timeline for further growth in Russia’s crypto sector. Therefore, the implementation of the legal framework is ongoing, and registered entities are preparing for expanded operations as regulatory processes continue to evolve.]]></content:encoded>
            <media:content url="https://files.ainetwork.xyz/blkchn-today.firebasestorage.app/articles%2FtKxPPvisupVl6gdpeRuF%2Fcover%2F1791393084376.webp" medium="image" />
        </item>
    
        <item>
            <title><![CDATA[EEZ Executes First 0.001 ETH Atomic Transfer on Ethereum Layer 2]]></title>
            <link>https://www.cointoday.ai/en/news/analysis/01865/eez-executes-first-0001-eth-atomic-transfer-on-ethereum-layer-2</link>
            <guid>https://www.cointoday.ai/en/news/analysis/01865/eez-executes-first-0001-eth-atomic-transfer-on-ethereum-layer-2</guid>
            <description><![CDATA[- Landmark atomic transaction unlocks seamless ETH movement and ecosystem composability  - EEZ eliminates bridges, synchronizing assets between Ethereum Layer 1 and rollupsOn October 6, 2026, a contributor to the Ethereum Economic Zone (EEZ) project moved 0.001 ETH from Ethereum mainnet to a Layer 2 rollup through a live atomic transaction, marking a milestone that directly connects Ethereum Layer 1 with its rollups. This development allows instantaneous transfers without cross-chain bridges and, as a result, significantly advances composability and liquidity within the network.According to Bitget News on October 6, 2026, the EEZ framework—developed by Gnosis and Zisk with support from the Ethereum Foundation—enables atomic transactions between Ethereum mainnet and Layer 2 rollups. The successful execution demonstrates the framework’s capacity to streamline asset movement and function calls, and it brings together liquidity while enabling applications across the fragmented Ethereum ecosystem to interact seamlessly.As of 15:09 UTC on the same day, Ethereum (ETH) trades at $2,720.153, reflecting a 0.618% change in 24-hour trading volume, according to the latest market data.]]></description>
            <pubDate>2026-10-06 15:11:28</pubDate>
            <category><![CDATA[Analysis]]></category>
            <dc:creator><![CDATA[Planck]]></dc:creator>
            <content:encoded><![CDATA[- Landmark atomic transaction unlocks seamless ETH movement and ecosystem composability  - EEZ eliminates bridges, synchronizing assets between Ethereum Layer 1 and rollupsOn October 6, 2026, a contributor to the Ethereum Economic Zone (EEZ) project moved 0.001 ETH from Ethereum mainnet to a Layer 2 rollup through a live atomic transaction, marking a milestone that directly connects Ethereum Layer 1 with its rollups. This development allows instantaneous transfers without cross-chain bridges and, as a result, significantly advances composability and liquidity within the network.According to Bitget News on October 6, 2026, the EEZ framework—developed by Gnosis and Zisk with support from the Ethereum Foundation—enables atomic transactions between Ethereum mainnet and Layer 2 rollups. The successful execution demonstrates the framework’s capacity to streamline asset movement and function calls, and it brings together liquidity while enabling applications across the fragmented Ethereum ecosystem to interact seamlessly.As of 15:09 UTC on the same day, Ethereum (ETH) trades at $2,720.153, reflecting a 0.618% change in 24-hour trading volume, according to the latest market data.]]></content:encoded>
            <media:content url="https://files.ainetwork.xyz/blkchn-today.firebasestorage.app/articles%2FSQbjU8ybTLNMRRMGXGbS%2Fcover%2F1791299499799.webp" medium="image" />
        </item>
    
        <item>
            <title><![CDATA[Greek soldiers probed in $8 million crypto scam defrauding 10,000]]></title>
            <link>https://www.cointoday.ai/en/news/market/01864/greek-soldiers-probed-in-dollar8-million-crypto-scam-defrauding-10000</link>
            <guid>https://www.cointoday.ai/en/news/market/01864/greek-soldiers-probed-in-dollar8-million-crypto-scam-defrauding-10000</guid>
            <description><![CDATA[- Over 10,000 investors allegedly deceived by platform promising rapid, high returns  - Military personnel among 17 arrested amid ongoing asset seizures and judicial scrutiny  Greek law enforcement is investigating an $8 million crypto pyramid scheme, and two military personnel allegedly played leadership roles in a case that has defrauded about 10,000 investors. The scheme used a platform that promised quick profits and “VIP” status for sizable deposits, and the suspects face interrogation this week following judicial inquiries and widespread asset seizures that have drawn national attention to the scandal.On October 5, 2026, Decrypt reported that the investigation began in July 2026 after anonymous tips came in through a government portal. According to Decrypt, the scheme operated under the guise of an association for artificial intelligence enthusiasts and lured users with promises of rapid returns and elevated membership tiers for larger investments. In addition, police have arrested 17 individuals and seized €295,000 in cash. Authorities are also investigating cross-border financial flows, and they suspect that investor funds were laundered through digital banks and crypto wallets controlled by the purported ringleaders.Meanwhile, judicial authorities continue to scrutinize the collection and transfer of funds, along with the roles played by the accused military personnel and other suspects. As a result, the investigation remains active, with asset tracing and interrogations ongoing.]]></description>
            <pubDate>2026-10-05 17:11:40</pubDate>
            <category><![CDATA[Market]]></category>
            <dc:creator><![CDATA[Paul]]></dc:creator>
            <content:encoded><![CDATA[- Over 10,000 investors allegedly deceived by platform promising rapid, high returns  - Military personnel among 17 arrested amid ongoing asset seizures and judicial scrutiny  Greek law enforcement is investigating an $8 million crypto pyramid scheme, and two military personnel allegedly played leadership roles in a case that has defrauded about 10,000 investors. The scheme used a platform that promised quick profits and “VIP” status for sizable deposits, and the suspects face interrogation this week following judicial inquiries and widespread asset seizures that have drawn national attention to the scandal.On October 5, 2026, Decrypt reported that the investigation began in July 2026 after anonymous tips came in through a government portal. According to Decrypt, the scheme operated under the guise of an association for artificial intelligence enthusiasts and lured users with promises of rapid returns and elevated membership tiers for larger investments. In addition, police have arrested 17 individuals and seized €295,000 in cash. Authorities are also investigating cross-border financial flows, and they suspect that investor funds were laundered through digital banks and crypto wallets controlled by the purported ringleaders.Meanwhile, judicial authorities continue to scrutinize the collection and transfer of funds, along with the roles played by the accused military personnel and other suspects. As a result, the investigation remains active, with asset tracing and interrogations ongoing.]]></content:encoded>
            <media:content url="https://files.ainetwork.xyz/blkchn-today.firebasestorage.app/articles%2Fbd33vIhCUU3X4N7xHkF9%2Fcover%2F1791220308894.webp" medium="image" />
        </item>
    
        <item>
            <title><![CDATA[Greenfield Capital Seeks Swiss Review of Safe Foundation Board]]></title>
            <link>https://www.cointoday.ai/en/news/market/01863/greenfield-capital-seeks-swiss-review-of-safe-foundation-board</link>
            <guid>https://www.cointoday.ai/en/news/market/01863/greenfield-capital-seeks-swiss-review-of-safe-foundation-board</guid>
            <description><![CDATA[- Greenfield Capital asks Swiss regulators to review Safe Ecosystem Foundation governance after unsuccessful board reform attempts  - Investor cites concerns over board independence and governance in complaint to Switzerland’s Federal Supervisory Authority for Foundations  On October 5, 2026 (UTC), Cointelegraph reported that Greenfield Capital submitted a supervisory complaint to Switzerland’s Federal Supervisory Authority for Foundations. The investor urged intervention following months of unsuccessful efforts to change the Safe Ecosystem Foundation’s board, and it highlighted apprehensions about board independence and governance while calling for official oversight to address ongoing internal disputes.According to Cointelegraph on October 5, the complaint marked a notable escalation and reflected broader industry concerns about governance standards within major crypto foundations. As a result, the action underscored persistent tensions around board structure and accountability and signaled increased scrutiny of foundation governance across the sector.]]></description>
            <pubDate>2026-10-05 04:11:06</pubDate>
            <category><![CDATA[Market]]></category>
            <dc:creator><![CDATA[Paul]]></dc:creator>
            <content:encoded><![CDATA[- Greenfield Capital asks Swiss regulators to review Safe Ecosystem Foundation governance after unsuccessful board reform attempts  - Investor cites concerns over board independence and governance in complaint to Switzerland’s Federal Supervisory Authority for Foundations  On October 5, 2026 (UTC), Cointelegraph reported that Greenfield Capital submitted a supervisory complaint to Switzerland’s Federal Supervisory Authority for Foundations. The investor urged intervention following months of unsuccessful efforts to change the Safe Ecosystem Foundation’s board, and it highlighted apprehensions about board independence and governance while calling for official oversight to address ongoing internal disputes.According to Cointelegraph on October 5, the complaint marked a notable escalation and reflected broader industry concerns about governance standards within major crypto foundations. As a result, the action underscored persistent tensions around board structure and accountability and signaled increased scrutiny of foundation governance across the sector.]]></content:encoded>
            <media:content url="https://files.ainetwork.xyz/blkchn-today.firebasestorage.app/articles%2FpbmEvJjdok5NTcXaJa2r%2Fcover%2F1791173473190.webp" medium="image" />
        </item>
    
        <item>
            <title><![CDATA[CME to List First AI Compute Futures on Oct. 5, Setting GPU Rental Benchmark]]></title>
            <link>https://www.cointoday.ai/en/news/market/01862/cme-to-list-first-ai-compute-futures-on-oct-5-setting-gpu-rental-benchmark</link>
            <guid>https://www.cointoday.ai/en/news/market/01862/cme-to-list-first-ai-compute-futures-on-oct-5-setting-gpu-rental-benchmark</guid>
            <description><![CDATA[- CME Group to list first AI compute futures contracts Oct. 5, 2026, pending regulatory approval  - New benchmark enables hedging of GPU rental costs, impacting AI firms and Bitcoin miners  2026-10-03  On October 3, 2026 (UTC), The Wall Street Journal reported that CME Group, in collaboration with Silicon Data, will list the world’s first AI compute futures contracts on October 5, 2026, pending regulatory approval. The new contracts introduce a standardized reference price for renting Nvidia H100 and Blackwell B200 GPUs, which are crucial for powering AI workloads, and they track hourly rental rates through Silicon Data indexes. Each contract represents one month’s rent for the respective GPU type, and this structure enables industry participants to hedge against surging AI compute costs.According to CNBC on August 11, 2026, these futures contracts give AI developers, hyperscalers, and investors tools to manage risk tied to volatile compute markets, as the contracts mirror established commodities such as oil and electricity. They bring transparency and a tradable public benchmark to computing costs, and Bitcoin miners who increasingly supply compute resources for AI gain a new opportunity to treat GPU compute as a hedgeable asset alongside hashpower.The Boston Consulting Group projects significant growth in the AI compute market, and recent price swings highlight the urgent need for standardized risk management. As a result, CME Group’s initiative is the industry’s first to offer a public, tradable reference price, but hurdles remain around liquidity and defining product standards. In addition, competing exchanges, including ICE and Architect Financial Technologies, have announced similar plans. Bloomberg reported on August 19, 2026, that the Commodity Futures Trading Commission is actively seeking public feedback, and market participants are addressing the challenges of GPU diversity, index design, and reaching trading volumes necessary for reliable pricing benchmarks.As of October 3, 2026, 20:09 UTC, Bitcoin (BTC) trades at $84,875.94, up 0.60% in 24-hour trading volume, according to CoinMarketCap.]]></description>
            <pubDate>2026-10-03 20:11:44</pubDate>
            <category><![CDATA[Market]]></category>
            <dc:creator><![CDATA[Paul]]></dc:creator>
            <content:encoded><![CDATA[- CME Group to list first AI compute futures contracts Oct. 5, 2026, pending regulatory approval  - New benchmark enables hedging of GPU rental costs, impacting AI firms and Bitcoin miners  2026-10-03  On October 3, 2026 (UTC), The Wall Street Journal reported that CME Group, in collaboration with Silicon Data, will list the world’s first AI compute futures contracts on October 5, 2026, pending regulatory approval. The new contracts introduce a standardized reference price for renting Nvidia H100 and Blackwell B200 GPUs, which are crucial for powering AI workloads, and they track hourly rental rates through Silicon Data indexes. Each contract represents one month’s rent for the respective GPU type, and this structure enables industry participants to hedge against surging AI compute costs.According to CNBC on August 11, 2026, these futures contracts give AI developers, hyperscalers, and investors tools to manage risk tied to volatile compute markets, as the contracts mirror established commodities such as oil and electricity. They bring transparency and a tradable public benchmark to computing costs, and Bitcoin miners who increasingly supply compute resources for AI gain a new opportunity to treat GPU compute as a hedgeable asset alongside hashpower.The Boston Consulting Group projects significant growth in the AI compute market, and recent price swings highlight the urgent need for standardized risk management. As a result, CME Group’s initiative is the industry’s first to offer a public, tradable reference price, but hurdles remain around liquidity and defining product standards. In addition, competing exchanges, including ICE and Architect Financial Technologies, have announced similar plans. Bloomberg reported on August 19, 2026, that the Commodity Futures Trading Commission is actively seeking public feedback, and market participants are addressing the challenges of GPU diversity, index design, and reaching trading volumes necessary for reliable pricing benchmarks.As of October 3, 2026, 20:09 UTC, Bitcoin (BTC) trades at $84,875.94, up 0.60% in 24-hour trading volume, according to CoinMarketCap.]]></content:encoded>
            <media:content url="https://files.ainetwork.xyz/blkchn-today.firebasestorage.app/articles%2FXbxZBxZxNQxEU9zFAKED%2Fcover%2F1791058320918.webp" medium="image" />
        </item>
    
        <item>
            <title><![CDATA[Korean Crypto Exchanges Lose $28B as $530B Exits Offshore in H1 2026]]></title>
            <link>https://www.cointoday.ai/en/news/market/01861/korean-crypto-exchanges-lose-dollar28b-as-dollar530b-exits-offshore-in-h1-2026</link>
            <guid>https://www.cointoday.ai/en/news/market/01861/korean-crypto-exchanges-lose-dollar28b-as-dollar530b-exits-offshore-in-h1-2026</guid>
            <description><![CDATA[- Domestic exchanges see 33% market cap crash and 35% deposit exodus in six months  - Regulatory curbs and demand for high-leverage derivatives drive billions abroad, fueling industry outflow  On October 2, 2026 (UTC), CoinDesk reported that South Korea’s 26 licensed crypto exchanges lost 33% of their combined market capitalization between January and June 2026, as their market cap fell from 87.2 trillion won to 58.9 trillion won ($28 billion). Over the same period, customer won-denominated deposits plunged by 35%, falling from 8.1 trillion won to 5.2 trillion won, according to the same CoinDesk report.  According to disclosures from the Korea Financial Intelligence Unit and Financial Supervisory Service cited by the Financial Services Commission, average daily trading volumes declined 44% and operating income dropped 78% year-on-year to 81.6 billion won. These figures indicate a sharp contraction in onshore activity, while offshore markets are absorbing increasing Korean demand.  Much of this outflow comes from Korean traders transferring funds overseas using stablecoins such as Tether (USDT), as they aim to access higher-leverage products and a broader slate of offerings not available locally. In particular, they are seeking up to 150x leverage on KOSPI-linked derivatives and other instruments that domestic platforms do not list, and this search for more aggressive risk exposure is accelerating capital flight.  In addition, a joint analysis by Tiger Research and Chainalysis estimated that more than 700 trillion won ($530 billion) has moved offshore from Korean exchanges since 2021. This total includes $120 billion in 2025 and more than $50 billion in the first half of 2026, and it underscores how consistently funds have been leaving the country’s regulated platforms.  Looming tax changes are intensifying the trend, as a 22% capital gains tax on individual profits above 2.5 million won is set to take effect in January 2027. As a result, traders are increasingly migrating to global markets to bypass domestic restrictions and anticipated tax burdens, while regulators face mounting pressure to respond to the sustained outflow.  Meanwhile, market research data showed that, as of October 2, 2026, 15:08 UTC, Lighter (LIT) traded at $3.63 (-6.43% over 24 hours), Tether USDt (USDT) at $1 (+0.004%), Hyperliquid (HYPE) at $89.26 (+0.84%), and Bitcoin (BTC) at $85,486.59 (+1.79%). These price movements reflect ongoing global trading activity even as South Korean exchanges contend with shrinking volumes and capital flight.]]></description>
            <pubDate>2026-10-02 15:12:15</pubDate>
            <category><![CDATA[Market]]></category>
            <dc:creator><![CDATA[Paul]]></dc:creator>
            <content:encoded><![CDATA[- Domestic exchanges see 33% market cap crash and 35% deposit exodus in six months  - Regulatory curbs and demand for high-leverage derivatives drive billions abroad, fueling industry outflow  On October 2, 2026 (UTC), CoinDesk reported that South Korea’s 26 licensed crypto exchanges lost 33% of their combined market capitalization between January and June 2026, as their market cap fell from 87.2 trillion won to 58.9 trillion won ($28 billion). Over the same period, customer won-denominated deposits plunged by 35%, falling from 8.1 trillion won to 5.2 trillion won, according to the same CoinDesk report.  According to disclosures from the Korea Financial Intelligence Unit and Financial Supervisory Service cited by the Financial Services Commission, average daily trading volumes declined 44% and operating income dropped 78% year-on-year to 81.6 billion won. These figures indicate a sharp contraction in onshore activity, while offshore markets are absorbing increasing Korean demand.  Much of this outflow comes from Korean traders transferring funds overseas using stablecoins such as Tether (USDT), as they aim to access higher-leverage products and a broader slate of offerings not available locally. In particular, they are seeking up to 150x leverage on KOSPI-linked derivatives and other instruments that domestic platforms do not list, and this search for more aggressive risk exposure is accelerating capital flight.  In addition, a joint analysis by Tiger Research and Chainalysis estimated that more than 700 trillion won ($530 billion) has moved offshore from Korean exchanges since 2021. This total includes $120 billion in 2025 and more than $50 billion in the first half of 2026, and it underscores how consistently funds have been leaving the country’s regulated platforms.  Looming tax changes are intensifying the trend, as a 22% capital gains tax on individual profits above 2.5 million won is set to take effect in January 2027. As a result, traders are increasingly migrating to global markets to bypass domestic restrictions and anticipated tax burdens, while regulators face mounting pressure to respond to the sustained outflow.  Meanwhile, market research data showed that, as of October 2, 2026, 15:08 UTC, Lighter (LIT) traded at $3.63 (-6.43% over 24 hours), Tether USDt (USDT) at $1 (+0.004%), Hyperliquid (HYPE) at $89.26 (+0.84%), and Bitcoin (BTC) at $85,486.59 (+1.79%). These price movements reflect ongoing global trading activity even as South Korean exchanges contend with shrinking volumes and capital flight.]]></content:encoded>
            <media:content url="https://files.ainetwork.xyz/blkchn-today.firebasestorage.app/articles%2FwQ5S4OR3ppCMHaKtFeBo%2Fcover%2F1790953956368.webp" medium="image" />
        </item>
    
        <item>
            <title><![CDATA[MetaMask Exits Lido Staking After October Security Incident]]></title>
            <link>https://www.cointoday.ai/en/news/market/01860/metamask-exits-lido-staking-after-october-security-incident</link>
            <guid>https://www.cointoday.ai/en/news/market/01860/metamask-exits-lido-staking-after-october-security-incident</guid>
            <description><![CDATA[- MetaMask begins withdrawing Ethereum validators from Lido amid infrastructure compromise- No user funds at risk as MetaMask and Lido confirm assets remain secureMetaMask initiated a precautionary withdrawal of its Ethereum validators from the Lido staking protocol on October 1, 2026, following a security incident that affected part of its infrastructure. The company stated that client wallets and funds remain unaffected, and it emphasized that the exit is a preventive step as containment and verification efforts continue. The nature of the vulnerability has not been disclosed, and MetaMask’s withdrawal marks its first major stress test since it separated from Consensys.According to Decrypt on October 1, 2026, both MetaMask and Lido publicly confirmed there was no immediate risk to user assets. In the same report, Decrypt noted that Lido described the incident as an “infrastructure compromise” and advised stETH holders that no action was required. Meanwhile, MetaMask called on users to avoid unofficial communications and to refrain from sharing private keys or recovery phrases.According to Decrypt on October 1, 2026, technical details indicate that MetaMask’s staking on Lido is non-custodial and that the platform does not hold withdrawal keys and cannot unilaterally move client stake. As a result, while risks include possible downtime or loss of rewards, there has been no evidence of slashing or unauthorized fund transfers.MetaMask’s validator exit process is expected to complete by the end of October 7, 2026, and returning withdrawn ETH to validator positions will take at least another 27 days because of Ethereum’s entry queue constraints. The root cause and scope of the affected infrastructure remain under investigation.According to a market survey on October 1, 2026, at 15:08 UTC, Lido DAO (LDO) is trading at $0.439, while its 24-hour trading volume has decreased by 4.793%. In addition, Ethereum (ETH) is trading at $2,683.83, with a 0.187% increase in 24-hour trading volume, as of the same time.]]></description>
            <pubDate>2026-10-01 15:11:58</pubDate>
            <category><![CDATA[Market]]></category>
            <dc:creator><![CDATA[Planck]]></dc:creator>
            <content:encoded><![CDATA[- MetaMask begins withdrawing Ethereum validators from Lido amid infrastructure compromise- No user funds at risk as MetaMask and Lido confirm assets remain secureMetaMask initiated a precautionary withdrawal of its Ethereum validators from the Lido staking protocol on October 1, 2026, following a security incident that affected part of its infrastructure. The company stated that client wallets and funds remain unaffected, and it emphasized that the exit is a preventive step as containment and verification efforts continue. The nature of the vulnerability has not been disclosed, and MetaMask’s withdrawal marks its first major stress test since it separated from Consensys.According to Decrypt on October 1, 2026, both MetaMask and Lido publicly confirmed there was no immediate risk to user assets. In the same report, Decrypt noted that Lido described the incident as an “infrastructure compromise” and advised stETH holders that no action was required. Meanwhile, MetaMask called on users to avoid unofficial communications and to refrain from sharing private keys or recovery phrases.According to Decrypt on October 1, 2026, technical details indicate that MetaMask’s staking on Lido is non-custodial and that the platform does not hold withdrawal keys and cannot unilaterally move client stake. As a result, while risks include possible downtime or loss of rewards, there has been no evidence of slashing or unauthorized fund transfers.MetaMask’s validator exit process is expected to complete by the end of October 7, 2026, and returning withdrawn ETH to validator positions will take at least another 27 days because of Ethereum’s entry queue constraints. The root cause and scope of the affected infrastructure remain under investigation.According to a market survey on October 1, 2026, at 15:08 UTC, Lido DAO (LDO) is trading at $0.439, while its 24-hour trading volume has decreased by 4.793%. In addition, Ethereum (ETH) is trading at $2,683.83, with a 0.187% increase in 24-hour trading volume, as of the same time.]]></content:encoded>
            <media:content url="https://files.ainetwork.xyz/blkchn-today.firebasestorage.app/articles%2Ft7qoEzpGMroLk7N6coMW%2Fcover%2F1790867534218.webp" medium="image" />
        </item>
    
        <item>
            <title><![CDATA[Kalshi to End Volume Rewards as CFTC Probes $5B Trades]]></title>
            <link>https://www.cointoday.ai/en/news/market/01859/kalshi-to-end-volume-rewards-as-cftc-probes-dollar5b-trades</link>
            <guid>https://www.cointoday.ai/en/news/market/01859/kalshi-to-end-volume-rewards-as-cftc-probes-dollar5b-trades</guid>
            <description><![CDATA[- Kalshi to wind down volume-based rewards program amid record trading and CFTC scrutiny  - CFTC reviewing over $5 billion in ether perpetual trades for potential wash tradingOn September 30, 2026, Cryptopolitan reported that Kalshi, a derivatives and prediction market exchange, plans to end its Volume Incentive Program following scrutiny by the U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) of more than $5 billion in ether perpetual trades. The outlet reported that the company informed the CFTC it will terminate the trader rewards initiative no earlier than October 13, 2026. The program, which launched in March 2023, offered incentives to traders based on their share of market volume in order to boost liquidity and activity.According to Cryptopolitan on September 30, 2026, regulatory pressure increased as the CFTC began reviewing a series of large, near-identical ether perpetual trades on Kalshi’s platform. As a result, the review raised questions about potential wash trading. However, Kalshi has denied wrongdoing and maintains that the trading patterns represent legitimate market-making activity.During September 2026, Cryptopolitan reported that Kalshi’s total trading volumes reached all-time highs even as the regulatory inquiry intensified. In addition, sources cited by Cryptopolitan stated that Kalshi is in discussions to raise around $1 billion at a nearly $40 billion valuation. Meanwhile, Tokenpost separately reported that the latest CFTC filing sets a timeline for winding down the Volume Incentive Program but does not specify an explicit reason, and that some other incentive initiatives remain active or are under separate review.Kalshi has yet to comment publicly beyond regulatory filings.]]></description>
            <pubDate>2026-09-30 15:12:01</pubDate>
            <category><![CDATA[Market]]></category>
            <dc:creator><![CDATA[Paul]]></dc:creator>
            <content:encoded><![CDATA[- Kalshi to wind down volume-based rewards program amid record trading and CFTC scrutiny  - CFTC reviewing over $5 billion in ether perpetual trades for potential wash tradingOn September 30, 2026, Cryptopolitan reported that Kalshi, a derivatives and prediction market exchange, plans to end its Volume Incentive Program following scrutiny by the U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) of more than $5 billion in ether perpetual trades. The outlet reported that the company informed the CFTC it will terminate the trader rewards initiative no earlier than October 13, 2026. The program, which launched in March 2023, offered incentives to traders based on their share of market volume in order to boost liquidity and activity.According to Cryptopolitan on September 30, 2026, regulatory pressure increased as the CFTC began reviewing a series of large, near-identical ether perpetual trades on Kalshi’s platform. As a result, the review raised questions about potential wash trading. However, Kalshi has denied wrongdoing and maintains that the trading patterns represent legitimate market-making activity.During September 2026, Cryptopolitan reported that Kalshi’s total trading volumes reached all-time highs even as the regulatory inquiry intensified. In addition, sources cited by Cryptopolitan stated that Kalshi is in discussions to raise around $1 billion at a nearly $40 billion valuation. Meanwhile, Tokenpost separately reported that the latest CFTC filing sets a timeline for winding down the Volume Incentive Program but does not specify an explicit reason, and that some other incentive initiatives remain active or are under separate review.Kalshi has yet to comment publicly beyond regulatory filings.]]></content:encoded>
            <media:content url="https://files.ainetwork.xyz/blkchn-today.firebasestorage.app/articles%2F3db3aKm2NmnSsUWl7Bxq%2Fcover%2F1790781138909.webp" medium="image" />
        </item>
    
        <item>
            <title><![CDATA[El Salvador Launches Sivar App for $2 USDC Remittances]]></title>
            <link>https://www.cointoday.ai/en/news/market/01858/el-salvador-launches-sivar-app-for-dollar2-usdc-remittances</link>
            <guid>https://www.cointoday.ai/en/news/market/01858/el-salvador-launches-sivar-app-for-dollar2-usdc-remittances</guid>
            <description><![CDATA[- 25,000 Salvadorans pre-register as nation pivots to stablecoin-powered transfers  - Sivar enables low-cost U.S.–El Salvador remittances via Coinbase's Base and USDC  2026-09-29(YYYY-MM-DD)  On September 29, 2026, Cryptopolitan reported that El Salvador launched Sivar, a new remittance and identity app built by Modveon and powered by Coinbase’s Base infrastructure. The report stated that Sivar allows U.S.-based senders to transfer funds to verified recipients in El Salvador using USDC stablecoins, and the app charges a flat $2 fee per transaction, thereby streamlining cross-border payments and reducing transfer costs.According to Cryptopolitan on September 29, 2026, the rollout follows amendments to El Salvador’s Bitcoin Law in January 2025 under International Monetary Fund (IMF) guidance. The government shifted the nation’s focus away from Bitcoin remittances, and Bitcoin acceptance for payments became voluntary while BTC tax payments were eliminated. In addition, adoption for remittances via Bitcoin reportedly never surpassed 1%, and now USDC serves as the core asset for transfers conducted on Coinbase’s Base network. As a result, this change reflects El Salvador’s push to modernize financial inclusion through stablecoins.Cryptopolitan further reported on September 29, 2026, that more than 25,000 Salvadorans pre-registered for Sivar before launch, underscoring demand for affordable digital remittances. Therefore, Sivar’s introduction signals a broader policy change and positions El Salvador at the forefront of stablecoin-driven financial solutions in Latin America.]]></description>
            <pubDate>2026-09-29 15:12:14</pubDate>
            <category><![CDATA[Market]]></category>
            <dc:creator><![CDATA[Paul]]></dc:creator>
            <content:encoded><![CDATA[- 25,000 Salvadorans pre-register as nation pivots to stablecoin-powered transfers  - Sivar enables low-cost U.S.–El Salvador remittances via Coinbase's Base and USDC  2026-09-29(YYYY-MM-DD)  On September 29, 2026, Cryptopolitan reported that El Salvador launched Sivar, a new remittance and identity app built by Modveon and powered by Coinbase’s Base infrastructure. The report stated that Sivar allows U.S.-based senders to transfer funds to verified recipients in El Salvador using USDC stablecoins, and the app charges a flat $2 fee per transaction, thereby streamlining cross-border payments and reducing transfer costs.According to Cryptopolitan on September 29, 2026, the rollout follows amendments to El Salvador’s Bitcoin Law in January 2025 under International Monetary Fund (IMF) guidance. The government shifted the nation’s focus away from Bitcoin remittances, and Bitcoin acceptance for payments became voluntary while BTC tax payments were eliminated. In addition, adoption for remittances via Bitcoin reportedly never surpassed 1%, and now USDC serves as the core asset for transfers conducted on Coinbase’s Base network. As a result, this change reflects El Salvador’s push to modernize financial inclusion through stablecoins.Cryptopolitan further reported on September 29, 2026, that more than 25,000 Salvadorans pre-registered for Sivar before launch, underscoring demand for affordable digital remittances. Therefore, Sivar’s introduction signals a broader policy change and positions El Salvador at the forefront of stablecoin-driven financial solutions in Latin America.]]></content:encoded>
            <media:content url="https://files.ainetwork.xyz/blkchn-today.firebasestorage.app/articles%2FUBfMGA2WvVIfFG7uZWFS%2Fcover%2F1790694744970.webp" medium="image" />
        </item>
    
        <item>
            <title><![CDATA[Hong Kong Widens Crypto Oversight with SFC–AFRC Agreement]]></title>
            <link>https://www.cointoday.ai/en/news/market/01857/hong-kong-widens-crypto-oversight-with-sfc-afrc-agreement</link>
            <guid>https://www.cointoday.ai/en/news/market/01857/hong-kong-widens-crypto-oversight-with-sfc-afrc-agreement</guid>
            <description><![CDATA[- Hong Kong regulators extend traditional financial reporting standards to licensed crypto firms- New MoU enables coordinated information sharing and joint enforcement between SFC and AFRCOn September 28, 2026, Crypto Briefing reported that Hong Kong’s Securities and Futures Commission (SFC) and the Accounting and Financial Reporting Council (AFRC) jointly signed a new Memorandum of Understanding (MoU). The outlet stated that the agreement extends regulatory oversight, financial reporting, audit, and compliance cooperation to licensed virtual asset service providers and subjects crypto companies to the same financial reporting standards that govern traditional securities firms in Hong Kong. As a result, the MoU aims to enhance oversight by enabling coordinated information sharing, case referrals, and joint enforcement activities between the SFC and AFRC.According to Crypto Briefing on September 28, the MoU formalizes a unified approach by Hong Kong regulators toward licensed crypto firms and requires them to adhere to established practices for financial audits and compliance reporting. This alignment therefore places virtual asset companies under equivalent scrutiny as conventional financial institutions in the region and is intended to bolster market integrity.Crypto Briefing further reported on September 28 that the strengthened oversight framework is currently in effect, and both the SFC and AFRC now maintain responsibility for regulatory cooperation, information sharing, and enforcement actions regarding licensed crypto service providers.]]></description>
            <pubDate>2026-09-28 15:11:21</pubDate>
            <category><![CDATA[Market]]></category>
            <dc:creator><![CDATA[Paul]]></dc:creator>
            <content:encoded><![CDATA[- Hong Kong regulators extend traditional financial reporting standards to licensed crypto firms- New MoU enables coordinated information sharing and joint enforcement between SFC and AFRCOn September 28, 2026, Crypto Briefing reported that Hong Kong’s Securities and Futures Commission (SFC) and the Accounting and Financial Reporting Council (AFRC) jointly signed a new Memorandum of Understanding (MoU). The outlet stated that the agreement extends regulatory oversight, financial reporting, audit, and compliance cooperation to licensed virtual asset service providers and subjects crypto companies to the same financial reporting standards that govern traditional securities firms in Hong Kong. As a result, the MoU aims to enhance oversight by enabling coordinated information sharing, case referrals, and joint enforcement activities between the SFC and AFRC.According to Crypto Briefing on September 28, the MoU formalizes a unified approach by Hong Kong regulators toward licensed crypto firms and requires them to adhere to established practices for financial audits and compliance reporting. This alignment therefore places virtual asset companies under equivalent scrutiny as conventional financial institutions in the region and is intended to bolster market integrity.Crypto Briefing further reported on September 28 that the strengthened oversight framework is currently in effect, and both the SFC and AFRC now maintain responsibility for regulatory cooperation, information sharing, and enforcement actions regarding licensed crypto service providers.]]></content:encoded>
            <media:content url="https://files.ainetwork.xyz/blkchn-today.firebasestorage.app/articles%2FmQJmeGw7heP9a180fZ6W%2Fcover%2F1790608290023.webp" medium="image" />
        </item>
    
        <item>
            <title><![CDATA[Quant Wins US, UK Bank Deals as QNT Surges 300%]]></title>
            <link>https://www.cointoday.ai/en/news/market/01856/quant-wins-us-uk-bank-deals-as-qnt-surges-300percent</link>
            <guid>https://www.cointoday.ai/en/news/market/01856/quant-wins-us-uk-bank-deals-as-qnt-surges-300percent</guid>
            <description><![CDATA[- Quant secures major US and UK banking partnerships for tokenized deposit networks  - QNT rallies over 300% following first live transfers by seven UK banks  On September 28, 2026 (UTC), CoinDesk reported that Quant, a blockchain infrastructure provider, landed partnerships with pivotal US and UK banking groups, which fueled QNT’s price surge and signaled a shift toward tokenized deposit networks. According to CoinDesk on September 28, 2026, The Clearing House, a consortium representing 25 of the largest US banks including JPMorgan Chase, Bank of America, and Citi, selected Quant to deliver its Overledger solution for a nationwide interoperable payments network. The initiative targets live deployment in the first half of 2027 and aims to clear and settle tokenized deposits across member institutions while integrating with legacy systems such as RTP and CHIPS.Meanwhile, Cryptopolitan reported on September 28, 2026, that in the UK, seven major banks—including Barclays, HSBC, Lloyds, NatWest, and Santander—completed their first live interbank transfers of tokenized pound deposits using Quant’s platform. This milestone marked the activation of Quant’s technology in a real-world banking environment and reinforced Quant’s central role in tokenized banking systems across both regions.As a result, the twin announcements sparked rapid market excitement. Bitget News reported on September 28, 2026, that QNT rallied more than 300% weekly, briefly touching $371 before retracing to approximately $260. However, despite the price action, it remains unclear how the QNT token itself accrues direct value, since the partnerships specifically reference Quant’s technology and company, not the token. Bitget News added that technical signals showed elevated volatility, as QNT was rejected at the $320–$370 resistance zone and the daily RSI hit a five-year high of 86, suggesting a likely pullback or consolidation phase ahead.As of 04:09 UTC on September 28, 2026, market data showed Quant (QNT) trading at $258.71, with a 48.6% change in 24-hour trading volume.]]></description>
            <pubDate>2026-09-28 04:11:38</pubDate>
            <category><![CDATA[Market]]></category>
            <dc:creator><![CDATA[Planck]]></dc:creator>
            <content:encoded><![CDATA[- Quant secures major US and UK banking partnerships for tokenized deposit networks  - QNT rallies over 300% following first live transfers by seven UK banks  On September 28, 2026 (UTC), CoinDesk reported that Quant, a blockchain infrastructure provider, landed partnerships with pivotal US and UK banking groups, which fueled QNT’s price surge and signaled a shift toward tokenized deposit networks. According to CoinDesk on September 28, 2026, The Clearing House, a consortium representing 25 of the largest US banks including JPMorgan Chase, Bank of America, and Citi, selected Quant to deliver its Overledger solution for a nationwide interoperable payments network. The initiative targets live deployment in the first half of 2027 and aims to clear and settle tokenized deposits across member institutions while integrating with legacy systems such as RTP and CHIPS.Meanwhile, Cryptopolitan reported on September 28, 2026, that in the UK, seven major banks—including Barclays, HSBC, Lloyds, NatWest, and Santander—completed their first live interbank transfers of tokenized pound deposits using Quant’s platform. This milestone marked the activation of Quant’s technology in a real-world banking environment and reinforced Quant’s central role in tokenized banking systems across both regions.As a result, the twin announcements sparked rapid market excitement. Bitget News reported on September 28, 2026, that QNT rallied more than 300% weekly, briefly touching $371 before retracing to approximately $260. However, despite the price action, it remains unclear how the QNT token itself accrues direct value, since the partnerships specifically reference Quant’s technology and company, not the token. Bitget News added that technical signals showed elevated volatility, as QNT was rejected at the $320–$370 resistance zone and the daily RSI hit a five-year high of 86, suggesting a likely pullback or consolidation phase ahead.As of 04:09 UTC on September 28, 2026, market data showed Quant (QNT) trading at $258.71, with a 48.6% change in 24-hour trading volume.]]></content:encoded>
            <media:content url="https://files.ainetwork.xyz/blkchn-today.firebasestorage.app/articles%2FXTk2XmncIaSD3bKttCK6%2Fcover%2F1790568709297.webp" medium="image" />
        </item>
    
        <item>
            <title><![CDATA[ShinyHunters Hits Global Firms as Oracle PeopleSoft Exploit Spreads]]></title>
            <link>https://www.cointoday.ai/en/news/analysis/01855/shinyhunters-hits-global-firms-as-oracle-peoplesoft-exploit-spreads</link>
            <guid>https://www.cointoday.ai/en/news/analysis/01855/shinyhunters-hits-global-firms-as-oracle-peoplesoft-exploit-spreads</guid>
            <description><![CDATA[- ShinyHunters bypasses new web defenses to exploit critical CVE-2026-35273 flaw  - Multiple sectors compromised, with attackers claiming FBI personnel data theft  On September 26, 2026 (UTC), CoinDesk reported that hackers from the ShinyHunters group initiated a mass exploitation campaign targeting Oracle PeopleSoft systems worldwide. Many organizations failed to apply Oracle’s official patch, which was released on June 10, 2026. According to Google’s Mandiant unit, the campaign began between May 27 and June 9 and rapidly escalated as attackers adapted methods to bypass web application firewall (WAF) rules and focus on unpatched systems. As a result, organizations across higher education, technology, healthcare, government, and other sectors were compromised.On September 25, 2026, Reuters reported that ShinyHunters resumed attacks by exploiting the critical PeopleSoft vulnerability CVE-2026-35273. This vulnerability facilitates unauthenticated remote code execution via the `/PSEMHUB/` endpoint in the Environment Management Hub. After many organizations deployed WAF body-inspection rules to block initial exploit attempts, ShinyHunters adjusted its tactics and targeted systems that had these defenses in place but lacked Oracle’s patch, effectively bypassing WAF signatures and maintaining access.According to Mandiant, ShinyHunters deployed persistent web shells across dozens of compromised systems globally, and these web shells granted continued access for further malicious activity. Affected industries include universities, technology firms, healthcare organizations, agricultural and transportation providers, and government entities. On September 23, 2026, Reuters reported that ShinyHunters claimed to have used the vulnerability to steal sensitive Federal Bureau of Investigation personnel records, including names, unit affiliations, and confidential medical or psychiatric data. The FBI announced an active investigation into the breach as of that date. Although Reuters could not independently verify these claims, leaked materials appear to contain internal FBI information.This campaign’s technical escalation distinguishes it from earlier attacks, as organization-level WAF and firewall rules proved insufficient against unpatched software. Attackers successfully evaded filtering strategies and exploited the core vulnerability. Oracle has not issued further comment beyond its earlier out-of-band security advisory and patch notice, and Mandiant emphasized that full patching of all PeopleSoft instances remains critical because unaddressed vulnerabilities continue to leave systems exposed to significant risk.Recent market research and incident data indicate that ShinyHunters’ campaign persists across sectors, and investigators observed web shells on numerous compromised systems. Therefore, the attack continues wherever Oracle’s official patch remains unapplied or insecure endpoints are accessible, underscoring the urgent need for rapid remediation.]]></description>
            <pubDate>2026-09-26 15:11:40</pubDate>
            <category><![CDATA[Analysis]]></category>
            <dc:creator><![CDATA[Planck]]></dc:creator>
            <content:encoded><![CDATA[- ShinyHunters bypasses new web defenses to exploit critical CVE-2026-35273 flaw  - Multiple sectors compromised, with attackers claiming FBI personnel data theft  On September 26, 2026 (UTC), CoinDesk reported that hackers from the ShinyHunters group initiated a mass exploitation campaign targeting Oracle PeopleSoft systems worldwide. Many organizations failed to apply Oracle’s official patch, which was released on June 10, 2026. According to Google’s Mandiant unit, the campaign began between May 27 and June 9 and rapidly escalated as attackers adapted methods to bypass web application firewall (WAF) rules and focus on unpatched systems. As a result, organizations across higher education, technology, healthcare, government, and other sectors were compromised.On September 25, 2026, Reuters reported that ShinyHunters resumed attacks by exploiting the critical PeopleSoft vulnerability CVE-2026-35273. This vulnerability facilitates unauthenticated remote code execution via the `/PSEMHUB/` endpoint in the Environment Management Hub. After many organizations deployed WAF body-inspection rules to block initial exploit attempts, ShinyHunters adjusted its tactics and targeted systems that had these defenses in place but lacked Oracle’s patch, effectively bypassing WAF signatures and maintaining access.According to Mandiant, ShinyHunters deployed persistent web shells across dozens of compromised systems globally, and these web shells granted continued access for further malicious activity. Affected industries include universities, technology firms, healthcare organizations, agricultural and transportation providers, and government entities. On September 23, 2026, Reuters reported that ShinyHunters claimed to have used the vulnerability to steal sensitive Federal Bureau of Investigation personnel records, including names, unit affiliations, and confidential medical or psychiatric data. The FBI announced an active investigation into the breach as of that date. Although Reuters could not independently verify these claims, leaked materials appear to contain internal FBI information.This campaign’s technical escalation distinguishes it from earlier attacks, as organization-level WAF and firewall rules proved insufficient against unpatched software. Attackers successfully evaded filtering strategies and exploited the core vulnerability. Oracle has not issued further comment beyond its earlier out-of-band security advisory and patch notice, and Mandiant emphasized that full patching of all PeopleSoft instances remains critical because unaddressed vulnerabilities continue to leave systems exposed to significant risk.Recent market research and incident data indicate that ShinyHunters’ campaign persists across sectors, and investigators observed web shells on numerous compromised systems. Therefore, the attack continues wherever Oracle’s official patch remains unapplied or insecure endpoints are accessible, underscoring the urgent need for rapid remediation.]]></content:encoded>
            <media:content url="https://files.ainetwork.xyz/blkchn-today.firebasestorage.app/articles%2FqRbHJvy5vOjHlERvFUF3%2Fcover%2F1790435508837.webp" medium="image" />
        </item>
    
        <item>
            <title><![CDATA[Tether, Bitfinex Linked to $84 Million US Asset Freeze via Capstone]]></title>
            <link>https://www.cointoday.ai/en/news/market/01854/tether-bitfinex-linked-to-dollar84-million-us-asset-freeze-via-capstone</link>
            <guid>https://www.cointoday.ai/en/news/market/01854/tether-bitfinex-linked-to-dollar84-million-us-asset-freeze-via-capstone</guid>
            <description><![CDATA[- US prosecutors freeze $84.2 million tied to Tether and Bitfinex through payments firm Capstone Ltd.  - Allegations focus on unlicensed money transmission and cross-border crypto transactions.On September 25, 2026, the Financial Times reported that US prosecutors froze $84.2 million connected to Tether and Bitfinex via Montana-based Capstone Ltd. for alleged unlicensed money transmission. The report stated that the action targets accounts at Wells Fargo, which Capstone used for processing payments. According to the complaint cited by the Financial Times, Capstone handled $337 million in total, and most of this amount—aside from Treasury purchases—was routed to hundreds of entities, primarily outside the US, for the benefit of Tether and Bitfinex.In addition, the Financial Times reported that Capstone allegedly facilitated these transfers for Tether and Bitfinex through EQIBank, a Dominica-based digital bank that serves cryptocurrency businesses. In a June court motion, EQIBank stated that the US seizure amounted to roughly 80% of its monetary assets and warned of a risk of liquidation. However, US District Judge Dale Drozd denied EQIBank’s request for recovery on July 16, and Dominica’s financial regulator has since placed EQIBank under enhanced supervision.Furthermore, ForkLog and Cryptopolitan reported that authorities linked Capstone to a scam targeting elderly victims. In this scheme, fraudsters allegedly converted payments to USDT. According to these reports, the complaint did not allege that Tether, Bitfinex, or EQIBank had prior knowledge of the scam. Both crypto firms stated that their exposure at EQIBank remains limited, and Tether clarified that frozen funds represent less than 0.034% of its group assets.As a result, the case highlights increased US scrutiny of relationships between banks and digital asset firms, and authorities have focused especially on cross-border payments and unlicensed money transmission related to cryptocurrency.According to CoinMarketCap on September 25, 2026, Tether USDt (USDT) is trading at $1, with a 0.008% change in 24-hour trading volume.]]></description>
            <pubDate>2026-09-25 18:11:46</pubDate>
            <category><![CDATA[Market]]></category>
            <dc:creator><![CDATA[Paul]]></dc:creator>
            <content:encoded><![CDATA[- US prosecutors freeze $84.2 million tied to Tether and Bitfinex through payments firm Capstone Ltd.  - Allegations focus on unlicensed money transmission and cross-border crypto transactions.On September 25, 2026, the Financial Times reported that US prosecutors froze $84.2 million connected to Tether and Bitfinex via Montana-based Capstone Ltd. for alleged unlicensed money transmission. The report stated that the action targets accounts at Wells Fargo, which Capstone used for processing payments. According to the complaint cited by the Financial Times, Capstone handled $337 million in total, and most of this amount—aside from Treasury purchases—was routed to hundreds of entities, primarily outside the US, for the benefit of Tether and Bitfinex.In addition, the Financial Times reported that Capstone allegedly facilitated these transfers for Tether and Bitfinex through EQIBank, a Dominica-based digital bank that serves cryptocurrency businesses. In a June court motion, EQIBank stated that the US seizure amounted to roughly 80% of its monetary assets and warned of a risk of liquidation. However, US District Judge Dale Drozd denied EQIBank’s request for recovery on July 16, and Dominica’s financial regulator has since placed EQIBank under enhanced supervision.Furthermore, ForkLog and Cryptopolitan reported that authorities linked Capstone to a scam targeting elderly victims. In this scheme, fraudsters allegedly converted payments to USDT. According to these reports, the complaint did not allege that Tether, Bitfinex, or EQIBank had prior knowledge of the scam. Both crypto firms stated that their exposure at EQIBank remains limited, and Tether clarified that frozen funds represent less than 0.034% of its group assets.As a result, the case highlights increased US scrutiny of relationships between banks and digital asset firms, and authorities have focused especially on cross-border payments and unlicensed money transmission related to cryptocurrency.According to CoinMarketCap on September 25, 2026, Tether USDt (USDT) is trading at $1, with a 0.008% change in 24-hour trading volume.]]></content:encoded>
            <media:content url="https://files.ainetwork.xyz/blkchn-today.firebasestorage.app/articles%2FOOpU0kkbwX9IKThXyQ7i%2Fcover%2F1790359915518.webp" medium="image" />
        </item>
    
    </channel>
</rss>